Archive for 'film / photographic'
3#
April 10, 2010 by admin, under artworks, film / photographic.
3#” uses a track “composed” by media artist Seth Price, its music based on the forms of 1980s electronic pop songs. Price uses music production software to copy the structure of popular music from the recent past. By editing out one element (in this case, the singer), he comments on the genre through an imperfect copy. The video uses text (some quoted from Morrissey’s lyrics) and graphic transitions to outline an argument about how and why pop music functions, pointing to its promises of unique, infamous, and sublime experiences through repetition and mass distribution.
No Comments
Lady Ane Angel "ONE"
September 21, 2009 by ric, under film / photographic, inter-bodies / half-objects, mirrors / displays / frames, videos.
This agent provocateur style short is awefully similiar to my intentions for the tap dancer clip in Lacuna and even more for the “Aquis Submersus” print series…
No Comments
How to: Love
April 8, 2009 by ric, under artworks, film / photographic, inter-bodies / half-objects, stories / dreams, thoughts, videos.
Below is a re-appropriation of an intel commerical and music video using text from a wiki-how article entitled ‘how to love’.
Avolition follows here a similiar line of thought .in terms of emotional response and atmosphere. However, Avolition does not close on it self, leaving the machinic voice develop sort of platonic affair with it self. Lets not forget that Avolition is already conceived ‘visible’ platonic affair and not one which necessarily imposes its ‘platonicism’ on its spectators. Love in this clip however is fundamanetally technologically introvert, we only experience the theatrical suffering offered by the clear positioning of humans and machines (machines as narrator / humans as objects with desires that need administration) – the intangebility of the machine describing love whereas it will never experience it. The spectator in this sense is a passive one (Jacques Ranciere) who cannot enter into an ‘actual’ conversation about the definition and ethics that constitute love, or an empirical definition or knowledge production of such experience. This could be expanded and this is what I hope to have started with Avolition. Love is not intrinsicly human, instead it inhabits inside the relationships and social systems that we produce. “Under this light” (as in the stage set up when passing by Avolition at night) technology might have a place for co-producing the meaning and rules of love. But would this mean that it could also co-consume it as well?
And on another note, how can one make up rules about something as undefinable as love in the first place? It seems to always be an ongoing project.
No Comments
Self Sustainable Kinetic Cinematography
March 25, 2009 by ric, under artworks, bio-feedback / cybernetics, experimental / technical logs, film / photographic, formal / structural / grids, mirrors / displays / frames, thoughts, video installations.
As the third correction to my project proposal for my MFA major project I finally managed to determine a project research area which satisfies me technically, theoretically as well as professionally.
I often think of spatial structures which coexist both physically as well as virtually. I often imagine what would it be like to experience movement in space when we are withdrawn from the core role of viewer/user. If there is some other element in the system that now possesses that role, what are we in charge of?
Kinetic Cinematography for me consists of the act of filming and recording video by means of intelligent, interactive and mechanical systems.
What I would like to develop is a Kinetic Cinematography which tries its best to rely only on itself both subject and object.
It can hold 1 or multiple cameras and its focus on external subject matter, beyond itself, is irrelevant or at least unimportant.
Here the aim is more on how it is filmed and what angle and direction something is filmed in. I want to focus on the kinetic qualities of cinematography without human intervention. The camera is the performer, the documentor and the spectator all at once. So what does that make us?
The self sufficiency and decision making of angles, shots, movements, starts and stops is determined by the machine itself through kinetic or articifical intelligent means.
This is a key characteristic in describing what really the system is reflecting upon. It has a dynamic gaze on itself which is likely to cause a constantly unresolved anamorphic affect.
The use of computer vision can be used here as a metaphor for vision and instinct itself, as a fundamental part of the decision making process. Vision developed as a response to light to help us creatures explore the space around us and the objects in it. But this still is progressive and by all means uncomplete. We might have reached a final state in the physical evolution of the eye in which its biological progression has reached an halt. This does not mean that our intellectual understanding of vision cannot progress and evolve.
The techincal skills I want to gain from this research are:
mechanics, motors and building kinetic structures
C++, arduino
computer vision using: openCV, maxMSP, processing
Books that have influenced me are:
Zizek, S., The Parallax View
Deleuze, G., Cinema 1 & 2
Deleuze, G., Difference and Repetition
Hansen, M., New Philosophy for New Media
Bergson, H., Creative Evolution